A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STRATEGIC CHANGE IN CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES AMID BUSINESS DIVERSIFICATION

PDF (Українська)

Keywords

strategic change
evaluating the effectiveness
strategic change management
construction enterprise
business diversification
strategic change episode
business model adaptability

How to Cite

Oraievskyy, A., & Mykolaichuk, I. (2026). A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STRATEGIC CHANGE IN CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES AMID BUSINESS DIVERSIFICATION. Entrepreneurship and Trade, (50), 194-204. https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1256-2026-50-19

Abstract

The article examines the effectiveness of strategic change in construction enterprises amid business diversification. Long contract cycles, responsibilities distributed among project participants, and delayed outcomes make it difficult to judge a particular change by revenue growth or the number of completed projects alone. The aim is to develop a methodological approach to evaluating strategic change effectiveness that accounts for the role of diversification in change implementation. The methods include a synthesis of research on strategic transformation and business models, comparison of planned and realised outcomes for an individual episode, expert assessment of business model adaptability, and modelling of associations between change characteristics and goal attainment. Effectiveness is understood here as the degree to which predefined strategic objectives are achieved; evaluating implementation efficiency additionally requires comparable data on resources used. The unit of analysis is a strategic change episode with specified content, depth, organisational scope, and pace. The proposed procedure identifies the episode and the enterprise baseline, sets observation points and target indicators, measures business model adaptability, and compares achieved outcomes with objectives. An author-defined Business Model Fit Index comprises seven expert-rated dimensions and captures an intermediate outcome of business model adaptation rather than final goal attainment. Diversification is treated either as a condition shaping another change or as a separate episode with its own targets. The scientific contribution is to anchor the evaluation of effectiveness in the predefined objectives of an identifiable episode and the time when its outcomes can be observed, while measuring business model adaptation separately. The procedure is intended for testing on actual enterprise data; calculations using hypothetical observations do not confirm hypotheses for real enterprises. A subsequent assessment of implementation efficiency requires verified data on expenditure, episode duration, and achieved outcomes.

https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1256-2026-50-19
PDF (Українська)

References

Боштан А. Оцінка факторів і процесів, що впливають на диверсифікацію діяльності в будівельному секторі. Містобудування та територіальне планування. 2026. № 91. С. 380–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2026.91.380-392

Єрістов Д., Федулова І. Теоретичні основи управління конкурентоспроможністю будівельної компанії. Економіка та суспільство. 2024. № 66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-66-124

Миколайчук І. П., Ораєвський А. А. Стратегічні зміни на підприємствах будівельної галузі: концептуальна сутність та фактори впливу. Вісник Хмельницького національного університету. Економічні науки. 2025. Т. 346, № 5. С. 497–505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2025-346-5-72

Ораєвський А. А., Миколайчук І. П. Стратегічний потенціал будівельної галузі України: стан і перспективи розвитку в умовах цифрової трансформації. Вісник Львівського торговельно-економічного університету. Економічні науки. 2026. № 85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1205-2026-85-32

Acciarini C., Boccardelli P., Peruffo E. Strategic change: A systematic review, synthesis, and a future research agenda. European Management Review. 2024. Vol. 21, No. 4. P. 782–802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12668

Berg J. B., Thuesen C., Ernstsen S. K., Jensen P. A. Reconfiguring the construction value chain: Analysing key sources of friction in the business model archetypes of AEC companies in strategic partnerships. Construction Management and Economics. 2021. Vol. 39, No. 6. P. 533–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1925134

Das P., Hijazi A. A., Maxwell D. W., Moehler R. C. Can business models facilitate strategic transformation in construction firms? A systematic review and research agenda. Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15, No. 17. Art. 13022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713022

Drozdova Y., Bai S., Khmurova V., Miniailo O., Bulenok S. Changes impact on the development potential of the enterprise. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice. 2022. Vol. 4, No. 45. P. 153–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.45.2022.3822

Girod S. J. G., Whittington R. Reconfiguration, restructuring and firm performance: Dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal. 2017. Vol. 38, No. 5. P. 1121–1133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2543

Han W., Zhou Y., Lu R. Strategic orientation, business model innovation and corporate performance– Evidence from construction industry. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022. Vol. 13. Art. 971654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971654

Helfat C. E., Martin J. A. Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change and performance. Journal of Management. 2015. Vol. 41, No.5. P. 1281–1312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314561301

Hlushko O. Business diversification and changes in perspective strategies for managing innovation activities during martial law. Development Management. 2024. Vol. 23, No. 2. P. 70–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57111/devt/2.2024.70

Hlushko O. Evaluation of the effectiveness of diversification process management in an enterprise. Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management. 2025. Vol. 12, No. 2. P. 50–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56318/eem2025.02.050

Horbach M., Hudov V., Movsesyan A., Makeiev D. Key analytical indicators of successful implementation of strategic transformations in a construction enterprise. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency. 2024. Vol. 3, No. 53. P. 114–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2024.53(3).114-132

Pereli D., Koval I., Kryvushchenko S., Gega S. Methods and tools for evaluating strategy performance in construction company management. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency. 2024. Vol. 2, No. 54. P. 264–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2024.54(2).264-275

Preacher K. J., Hayes A. F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods. 2008. Vol. 40, No. 3. P. 879–891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

Shpakov A., Herasymchuk Ya., Koval I., Vovkovych Yu. Analysis of the level of implementation of systemic productivity of enterprises in view of the implementation of strategic changes. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency. 2024. Vol. 3, No. 53. P. 75–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2024.53(3).75-95

Teece D. J. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning. 2010. Vol.43, No. 2–3. P.172–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003

Topazly, R., Pokotylova, O., Olishevska, A., Mykolaichuk, I., Parajka, B., & Lysak, V. Business Leadership in Ukraine’s Construction Industry: The Role of Public-Private Interaction and Price, Investment, Labor, and Institutional Determinants of Development. Business Ethics and Leadership, 9(3), 194–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61093/bel.9(3).194-210.2025

Boshtan, A. (2026). Otsinka faktoriv i protsesiv, shcho vplyvaiut na dyversyfikatsiiu diialnosti v budivelnomu sektori [Assessment of factors and processes influencing the diversification of activities in the construction sector]. Mistobuduvannia ta terytorialne planuvannia, no. (91), pp. 380–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2026.91.380-392

Yeristov, D., & Fedulova, I. (2024). Teoretychni osnovy upravlinnia konkurentospromozhnistiu budivelnoi kompanii [Theoretical foundations of managing the competitiveness of a construction company]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, no. (66). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-66-124

Mykolaichuk, I. P., & Oraievskyy, A. A. (2025). Stratehichni zminy na pidpryiemstvakh budivelnoi haluzi: Kontseptualna sutnist ta faktory vplyvu [Strategic changes in construction enterprises: Conceptual nature and influencing factors]. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic Sciences, no. 346(5), pp. 497–505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2025-346-5-72

Oraievskyy, A. A., & Mykolaichuk, I. P. (2026). Stratehichnyi potentsial budivelnoi haluzi Ukrainy: stan i perspektyvy rozvytku v umovakh tsyfrovoi transformatsii [Strategic potential of Ukraine’s construction industry: Current state and development prospects under digital transformation]. Herald of Lviv University of Trade and Economics. Economic Sciences, no. (85). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1205-2026-85-32

Acciarini, C., Boccardelli, P., & Peruffo, E. (2024). Strategic change: A systematic review, synthesis, and a future research agenda. European Management Review, no. 21(4), pp. 782–802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12668

Berg, J. B., Thuesen, C., Ernstsen, S. K., & Jensen, P. A. (2021). Reconfiguring the construction value chain: Analysing key sources of friction in the business model archetypes of AEC companies in strategic partnerships. Construction Management and Economics, no. 39(6), pp. 533–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1925134

Das, P., Hijazi, A. A., Maxwell, D. W., & Moehler, R. C. (2023). Can business models facilitate strategic transformation in construction firms? A systematic review and research agenda. Sustainability, no. 15(17), Article 13022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713022

Drozdova, Y., Bai, S., Khmurova, V., Miniailo, O., & Bulenok, S. (2022). Changes impact on the development potential of the enterprise. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, no. 4(45), pp. 153–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.45.2022.3822

Girod, S. J. G., & Whittington, R. (2017). Reconfiguration, restructuring and firm performance: Dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, no. 38(5), pp. 1121–1133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2543

Han, W., Zhou, Y., & Lu, R. (2022). Strategic orientation, business model innovation and corporate performance– Evidence from construction industry. Frontiers in Psychology, no. 13, Article 971654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971654

Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change and performance. Journal of Management, no. 41(5), pp. 1281–1312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314561301

Hlushko, O. (2024). Business diversification and changes in perspective strategies for managing innovation activities during martial law. Development Management, no. 23(2), pp. 70–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57111/devt/2.2024.70

Hlushko, O. (2025). Evaluation of the effectiveness of diversification process management in an enterprise. Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management, no. 12(2), pp. 50–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56318/eem2025.02.050

Horbach, M., Hudov, V., Movsesyan, A., & Makeiev, D. (2024). Key analytical indicators of successful implementation of strategic transformations in a construction enterprise. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency, no. 3(53), pp. 114–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2024.53(3).114-132

Pereli, D., Koval, I., Kryvushchenko, S., & Gega, S. (2024). Methods and tools for evaluating strategy performance in construction company management. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency, no. 2(54), pp. 264–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2024.54(2).264-275

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, no. 40(3), pp. 879–891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

Shpakov, A., Herasymchuk, Ya., Koval, I., & Vovkovych, Yu. (2024). Analysis of the level of implementation of systemic productivity of enterprises in view of the implementation of strategic changes. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency, no. 3(53), pp. 75–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2024.53(3).75-95

Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, no. 43(2–3), pp. 172–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003

Topazly, R., Pokotylova, O., Olishevska, A., Mykolaichuk, I., Parajka, B., & Lysak, V. Business Leadership in Ukraine’s Construction Industry: The Role of Public-Private Interaction and Price, Investment, Labor, and Institutional Determinants of Development. Business Ethics and Leadership, no. 9(3), pp. 194–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61093/bel.9(3).194-210.2025

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.