Abstract
The relevance of the research topic is determined by the fact that enterprises in the construction sector operate under conditions of increasing resource constraints, intensifying competition, and the accelerated digital transformation of the industry, which requires appropriate methodological support for assessing their readiness for strategic change. The study proposes a methodological toolkit for diagnosing the strategic potential and digital maturity of construction enterprises. The proposed toolkit is based on a combination of resource-based, managerial, and technological approaches to assessment and involves the use of integrated indicators, expert assessment methods, and digital maturity indices, taking into account the specific characteristics of the construction industry. Three levels of the methodological toolkit are distinguished: resource-analytical, managerial-strategic, and technological-digital. Their content and interrelationships are identified and substantiated. The areas of diagnosing the strategic potential and digital maturity of construction enterprises are compared according to the following key dimensions: resource provision, management processes, human resource potential, technologies, and innovation. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the further development of a comprehensive approach to diagnosing the strategic potential of construction enterprises by integrating it with digital maturity assessment and structuring the corresponding methodological toolkit into three interrelated levels. The practical significance of the proposed approach lies in its potential application for identifying the strengths and weaknesses of an enterprise, determining development reserves, identifying digital and strategic gaps, substantiating priority areas for investment, and developing digital transformation programs. It is concluded that effective diagnosis of the strategic potential of construction enterprises requires a systematic combination of traditional methods for assessing resource and managerial capabilities with the assessment of digital maturity. Such integration makes it possible to improve the validity of strategic management decisions, promptly identify development constraints, and determine directions for strengthening the enterprise’s potential.
References
Рудницька О., Комаровський А. Стратегічне управління підприємством як важлива складова системи менеджменту. Економіка та суспільство. 2023. № 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-57-128
Малихіна О., Шлапак О., Остапенко І., Бованенко Д. Систематизація сучасних управлінських концепцій і моделей, релевантних будівельним підприємствам у цифрову епоху. Містобудування та територіальне планування. 2026. № 91. С. 460–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2026.91.460-470
Лич В., Куценко А. Методичні підходи до вибору стратегій забезпечення конкурентоспроможності підрядних будівельних підприємств. Просторовий розвиток. 2026. № 17. С. 523–535. Available at: https://spd.knuba.edu.ua/article/view/368770
Польова Н., Подібка В., Дмитришин Я. Стратегічне управління будівельними підприємствами. Сталий розвиток економіки. 2025. № 4(51). С. 176–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2308-1988/2024-51-25
Халіна В., Колбасинський Ю. Концепція адаптивного управління будівельним підприємством. Економіка та суспільство. 2025. № 75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-75-3
Фісуненко П. А. Підходи до визначення конкурентоспроможності підприємства: сутність та еволюція поняття. Бізнес-навігатор. 2020. Вип. 2(58). С. 152–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32847/business-navigator.58-28
Лич В. М., Куценко А. С. Конкурентоспроможність в умовах цифрової трансформації та глобальних змін. Будівельне виробництво. 2024. № 78. С. 73–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36750/2524-2555.78.73-79
Melnyk O., Zlotnik M. The essence and basic models of strategic enterprise management. Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management. 2020. Vol. 7, No. 1. P. 48–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23939/eem2020.01.048
Furrer O., Thomas H., Goussevskaia A. The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: a content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2008. Vol. 10, Iss. 1. P. 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00217.x
Fuertes G., Alfaro M., Vargas M., Gutierrez S., Ternero R., Sabattin J. Conceptual Framework for the Strategic Management: A Literature Review – Descriptive. Journal of Engineering. 2020. Vol. 2020. Article 6253013. 21 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6253013
Guerras-Martín L. Á., Madhok A., Montoro-Sánchez Á. The Evolution of Strategic Management Research: Recent Trends and Current Directions. Business Research Quarterly. 2014. Vol. 17, Iss. 2. P. 69–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2014.03.001
Chinowsky P. S., Meredith J. E. Strategic Management in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2000. Vol. 126, No. 1. P. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:1(1)
Price A. D. F., Newson E. Strategic Management: Consideration of Paradoxes, Processes, and Associated Concepts as Applied to Construction. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2003. Vol. 19, No. 4. P. 183–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2003)19:4(183)
Klitgaard A., Gottlieb S. C. Strategizing and Project Management in Construction Projects: An Exploratory Literature Review. 10th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization (Emerald Reach Proceedings Series, Vol. 2). Emerald Publishing Limited, 2019. P. 253–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2516-285320190000002040
Wang S., Su H., Hou Q., Grima S. Evolutionary game study on multi-agent value co-creation of service-oriented digital transformation in the construction industry. PLOS ONE. 2023. Vol. 18, No. 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285697
Rudnytska, O., & Komarovskyi, A. (2023). Stratehichne upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom yak vazhlyva skladova systemy menedzhmentu [Strategic enterprise management as an important component of the management system]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, no. 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-57-128
Malykhina, O., Shlapak, O., Ostapenko, I., & Bovanenko, D. (2026). Systematyzatsiia suchasnykh upravlinskykh kontseptsii i modelei, relevantnykh budivelnym pidpryiemstvam u tsyfrovu epokhu [Systematization of modern management concepts and models relevant to construction enterprises in the digital era]. Mistobuduvannia ta terytorialne planuvannia, no. 91, pp. 460–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2026.91.460-470
Lych, V., & Kutsenko, A. (2026). Metodychni pidkhody do vyboru stratehii zabezpechennia konkurentospromozhnosti pidriadnykh budivelnykh pidpryiemstv [Methodological approaches to selecting strategies for ensuring the competitiveness of construction contractors]. Prostorovyi rozvytok, no. 17, pp. 523–535. Available at: https://spd.knuba.edu.ua/article/view/368770
Polova, N., Podibka, V., & Dmytryshyn, Ya. (2025). Stratehichne upravlinnia budivelnymy pidpryiemstvamy [Strategic management of construction enterprises]. Stalyi rozvytok ekonomiky, no. 4(51), pp. 176–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2308-1988/2024-51-25
Khalina, V., & Kolbasynskyi, Yu. (2025). Kontseptsiia adaptyvnoho upravlinnia budivelnym pidpryiemstvom [The concept of adaptive management of a construction enterprise]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, no. 75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2025-75-3
Fisunenko, P. A. (2020). Pidkhody do vyznachennia konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstva: sutnist ta evoliutsiia poniattia [Approaches to determining enterprise competitiveness: Essence and evolution of the concept]. Biznes-navihator, is. 2(58), pp. 152–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32847/business-navigator.58-28
Lych, V. M., & Kutsenko, A. S. (2024). Konkurentospromozhnist v umovakh tsyfrovoi transformatsii ta hlobalnykh zmin [Competitiveness in the context of digital transformation and global changes]. Budivelne vyrobnytstvo, no. 78, pp. 73–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36750/2524-2555.78.73-79
Melnyk, O., & Zlotnik, M. (2020). The essence and basic models of strategic enterprise management. Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 48–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23939/eem2020.01.048
Furrer, O., Thomas, H., & Goussevskaia, A. (2008). The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 10, is. 1, pp. 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00217.x
Fuertes, G., Alfaro, M., Vargas, M., Gutierrez, S., Ternero, R., & Sabattin, J. (2020). Conceptual framework for the strategic management: A literature review – Descriptive. Journal of Engineering, vol. 2020, Article 6253013, 21 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6253013
Guerras-Martín, L. Á., Madhok, A., & Montoro-Sánchez, Á. (2014). The evolution of strategic management research: Recent trends and current directions. Business Research Quarterly, vol. 17, is. 2, pp. 69–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2014.03.001
Chinowsky, P. S., & Meredith, J. E. (2000). Strategic management in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:1(1)
Price, A. D. F., & Newson, E. (2003). Strategic management: Consideration of paradoxes, processes, and associated concepts as applied to construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 183–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2003)19:4(183)
Klitgaard, A., & Gottlieb, S. C. (2019). Strategizing and project management in construction projects: An exploratory literature review. In 10th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organization (Emerald Reach Proceedings Series, vol. 2, pp. 253–258). Emerald Publishing Limited. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2516-285320190000002040
Wang, S., Su, H., Hou, Q., & Grima, S. (2023). Evolutionary game study on multi-agent value co-creation of service-oriented digital transformation in the construction industry. PLOS ONE, vol. 18, no. 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285697

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

