INNOVATIVE MECHANISMS FOR COUNTERACTION VAT EVASION: EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE AND WAYS OF DE-SHADOWING THE UKRAINIAN ECONOMY
Abstract
The problem of VAT evasion is becoming particularly relevant in Ukraine due to insufficiently effective control, the widespread use of schemes to understate tax liabilities, the presence of gaps in tax legislation, the adoption of economically inexpedient decisions by lawmakers, as well as the lack of clear interaction between tax authorities, customs authorities, and other government agencies. This article examines the complex problem of value added tax (VAT) evasion in Ukraine and the countries of the European Union. The purpose of this study is to conduct an in-depth comparative analysis of advanced European experience in combating tax evasion, as well as to develop effective, adapted mechanisms for maximizing tax revenues under the conditions of the modern Ukrainian economy. The author has analyzed in detail the key VAT evasion schemes, including smuggling, “tax twisting” schemes, the use of fictitious enterprises, and large-scale shadow cash transactions. It is proven that the total losses to the State Budget of Ukraine from these schemes are critical, reaching more than UAH 160 billion annually. Based on a study of successful European experience (in particular, countries such as Poland, Hungary, Italy, and Portugal), the article substantiates the pressing need to implement digital systems for the instant exchange of tax data, such as eVAT and SAF-T. The methodological basis of the study is scenario modeling (pessimistic, realistic, and optimistic scenarios) of the potential reduction of the VAT gap in Ukraine for the period 2026-2028. The scientific novelty of the study lies in demonstrating the need for a synergistic approach. It is proven that the implementation of the SAF-T system will yield the maximum fiscal effect only when combined with strict limitations on cash transactions and mandatory notarization of lease agreements for movable and immovable property. The introduction of these systems and tools will make it impossible to conceal digital anomalies with fictitious documents and will undermine the basis for the unlawful formation of tax credit, which in turn will promote the de-shadowing of the economy and an increase in tax revenues to the budget of Ukraine
References
skhemy-na-mytnytsi-i-kontrabandu-taotrymaty-miliardy-hryven.html.
2. За 11 місяців 2024 року товарообіг України склав $101,9 млрд. Державна митна служба України. URL: https://customs.gov.ua/news/zagalne-
20/post/za-11-misiatsiv-2024-roku-tovaroobig-ukrayinisklav-1019-mlrd-1927.
3. Гетманцев Д., Гетьман О., Боярчук Д. Як змінились схеми ухилення від податків? CASE Україна. 2024. URL: https://cost.ua/yak-zminylysshemy-
uhylennya-vid-podatkiv/.
4. Черкашин В. Сьогоднішні схеми уникнення оподаткування: що не так із податками в Україні. ZN.UA. 2024. URL: https://zn.ua/ukr/finances/ sohodnishni-
skhemi-uniknennja-opodatkuvannja-shcho-netak-iz-podatkami-v-ukrajini.html.
5. Кіржецький Ю. І., Кіржецька М. С. Ухилення від сплати податку на додану вартість: схеми здійснення та документальне оформлення. Науковий вісник Львівського державного університету внутрішніх справ. Серія економічна. 2023. № 1. С. 11-17. DOI: 10.32782/2311-844X/2023-1-2.
6. Нашкерська М. М. Особливості ухилення та уникнення від сплати податків. Науковий вісник НЛТУ України. 2008. Вип. 18.7. С. 258-263.
7. Заклекта-Берестовенко О., Стаднік Т. Причини ухилення від оподаткування та шляхи їхнього усунення. Наука молода. Збірник наукових праць
молодих вчених Тернопільського національного економічного університету. Економічні науки. 2011. Вип. 15-16. С. 169-173.
8. B2G eBook EU VAT digitisation. Edicom. 2021. URL: https://f.hubspotusercontent30.net/hubfs/7768480/1.%20English/B2G/B2G%20eBook%20
EU%20VAT%20digitisation_2021_FINAL.pdf.
9. Electronic VAT SAF-T Poland (JPK_VAT). Edicom. URL: https://edicomgroup.com/blog/electronicvat-saft-poland-jpk-vat-jpk-cit.
10. Closing the VAT Gap: Insights from Hungary's Strategic Success. DevelopmentAid. 2025. URL: https://www.developmentaid.org/newsstream/
post/191698/closing-the-vat-gap.
11. VAT in the Digital Age. Edicom. URL: https://edicomgroup.com/blog/vat-digital-age.
12. Heinemann M. and Stiller W. Digitalization and cross-border tax fraud: evidence from e-invoicing in Italy. International Tax and Public Finance. 2025,
32(1), pp. 195-237. DOI: 10.1007/s10797-023-09820-x.
13. VAT Gap Report 2023. European Commission. URL: https://taxationcustoms. ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-10/VAT%20Gap%20Report%202023_0.pdf.
14. Italy e-invoicing compliance 2025. Global VAT Compliance. URL: https://www.globalvatcompliance.com/globalvatnews/it aly-e-invoicing-compliance-2025/.
15. New limit on cash transfers. Grant Thornton. 2023. URL: https://www.bgt-grantthornton.it/en/ insights/articles/2023/new-limit-on-cash-transfers/.
16. Italy Electronic Invoicing May 2021. Neobilten. URL: https://www.neobilten.com/wpcontent/uploads/2024/09/Italy-Electronic-invoicing-May-2021.pdf.
17. Wilks D. C. et al. “Please give me an invoice”: VAT evasion and the Portuguese tax lottery. Academia. edu. 2021. URL: https://www.academia.edu/47441574/_Please_give_me_an_invoice_VAT_evasion_and_the_Portuguese_tax_lottery.
18. Fight against VAT fraud: VAT gap. European Commission. URL: https://taxationcustoms. ec.europa.eu/taxation/vat/fight-against-vatfraud/vat-gap_en.
19. Portugal ramps up fight against tax evasion with fancy cars draw. Reuters. 2014. URL: https://www.reuters.com/article/business/portugalramps-up-fight-against-tax-evasion-with-fancy-carsdraw-idUSBREA330ME/.
20. NBG Economic Analysis Report (May 15-28, 2018). National Bank of Greece. 2018. URL: https://www.nbg.gr/-/jssmedia/Files/nbgportal/reports/migrateddata/
files/greek/the-group/press-office/espot/reports/documents/nbg-embw-15-28-may-2018.pdf.
21. Міністерство фінансів України. Доходи державного бюджету України 2024. Мінфін. URL: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/finance/budget/gov/income/2024/.
22. Autmann C., Beilschmidt C., Dronner J., Mattig M. and Seeger B. VAT: a system for visual analysis and transformation of spatial data in science. Datenbank Spektrum. 2015, 15(3), pp. 175-184. DOI: 10.1007/s13222-015-0197-y.
23. Barbone L., Bird R. M. and Vazquez-Caro J. The costs of VAT: a review of the literature. CASE Network Reports. 2012. No. 106/2012. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2024880.
24. Hellerstein W. and Grills T. H. The VAT in the European Union. Tax Notes International. 2010, 58, pp. 461-471. URL: https://taxprof.typepad.com/files/127tn0461.pdf.
25. Keen M. Taxation and development - again. IMF Working Paper. 2012. № 12/220. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/wp12220.pdf.
26. Keen M. and Lockwood B. The value added tax: its causes and consequences. Journal of Development Economics. 2010, 92(2), pp. 138-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.01.012.
27. Killington C. and Dalevski P. VAT deduction and non-economic activities: art or science? Tax Journal. 2017. P. 14-15. URL: https://home.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/uk/pdf/2017/06/vat-deduction-and-non-economic-activities.pdf.
28. Lamensch M. The principle of “substance over form” in relation to the right to deduct input VAT - a critical analysis of the “Barlis” case law. World Journal
of VAT/GST Law. 2017, 6(2), pp. 129-137. DOI: 10.1080/20488432.2017.1407126.
29. Hodžić S. and Čelebi H. Value added tax and its efficiency: EU-28 and Turkey. UTMS Journal of Economics. 2017, 8(2), pp. 79-90. URL: http://utmsjoe.mk/files/Vol.%208%20No.%202/UTMSJ OE-2017-0802-03-Hodzic-Celebi.pdf.
30. Semerád P. and Bartůňková L. VAT control statement as a tool against tax evasion in the Czech Republic. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016, 220, pp. 417-423. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.516.
31. Богер О. В. Податкове регулювання розвитку інноваційної економіки : автореф. дис. ... д-ра екон. наук. Київський національний економічний університет. Київ, 2016. URL:https://kneu.edu.ua/userfiles/d-
26.006.01/2016/Boger_dis.PDF.
32. Šimović H. and Deskar-Škrbić M. Efikasnost poreza na dodanu vrijednost u Hrvatskoj. EFZG Working Paper Series. 2016. 16-02. Zagreb : Faculty of Economics
and Business. URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/223529.
33. Spies K. Fundamental freedoms and VAT: an analysis based on the Crédit Lyonnais case. World Journal of VAT/GST Law. 2017, 6(2), pp. 100-128. DOI: 10.1080/20488432.2018.1460970.
34. Sopek P. Tax expenditures and efficiency of the Croatian value added tax. Financial Theory and Practice. 2012, 36(3), pp. 269-296. URL: http://www.ijf.hr/upload/files/file/FTP/2012/3/sopek.pdf.
35. Hutton E. The Revenue Administration - Gap Analysis Program: model and methodology for valueadded tax gap estimation. IMF Technical Notes and
Manuals. 2017. № 2017/004. International Monetary Fund. DOI: 10.5089/9781475583618.005.
36. CASE. Study and Reports on the VAT Gap in the EU-28 Member States. European Commission. 2023. URL: https://case-research.eu/publications/vatgap-in-the-eu-report-2023-2/.
_.png)