ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION ON FORECASTING MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS OF AN OPEN ECONOMY: THE EMPIRICAL APPROACH
Abstract
In the domestic scientific literature and practice of macroeconomic forecasting, the issue of systematic quantitative assessment of the impact of international information (in particular, indicators of global economic uncertainty) on forecast error remains insufficiently developed: the vast majority of studies focus either on descriptive analysis of individual channels of influence of external shocks, or on technical improvement of the forecast models themselves without explicit consideration of the information component. The article examines the impact of international economic information flows on the accuracy of macroeconomic forecasting in an open economy, using Ukraine as the primary case with a comparative reference to European Union countries. The essence of an open economy is revealed as a system deeply embedded in global information, trade and financial flows, and it is shown that the quality of macroeconomic forecasting increasingly depends not only on domestic statistical series but also on the speed, completeness and reliability with which international information is absorbed by forecasting agents – governments, central banks, international financial organizations and independent analytical centers. The theoretical and methodological approaches of domestic and foreign researchers to measuring economic uncertainty and assessing its impact on forecast quality are systematized. The statistical series for 2011-2025 is constructed, combining an indicator of Ukraine’s real GDP forecast error (the absolute difference between the official forecast and the actual outturn) and the Global Economic Policy Uncertainty Index (GEPU), built on the Baker-Bloom-Davis methodology with reference to the chronology of key crises. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis reveals a statistically significant, yet moderate, relationship between the level of global information uncertainty and the magnitude of the forecast error, a relationship substantially amplified by the idiosyncratic wartime shock of 2022. A comparative analysis with Eurozone countries reveals a considerably closer and more stable relationship between global uncertainty and forecast accuracy in a more institutionally mature open economy. Practical recommendations are substantiated for improving systems of monitoring and processing international information in the macroeconomic forecasting process in Ukraine under conditions of post-war recovery.
References
2. Міністерство економіки та довкілля України. URL: https://www.me.gov.ua/.
3. Обелець Т. В. Державне регулювання економіки в умовах невизначеності. Економічний вісник Національного технічного університету
України «Київський політехнічний інститут». 2023. № 27. С. 9-16. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20535/2307-5651.27.2023.297213.
4. Плахотнік О. О., Павленко А. А. Вплив глобалізації на розвиток світової економіки та економіки України. Економіка та держава. 2022. № 5.
С. 62-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2022.5.62.
5. Скрипниченко М. І. Макроекономічні оцінки і прогнози повоєнного відновлення економіки України. Економічна теорія. 2022. № 2. С.
29-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.02.029.
6. Юхименко Т. Роль засобів масової інформації в процесі формування інфляційних очікувань. Вісник Національного банку України. 2022. № 253.
С. 4-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26531/vnbu2022.253.01.
7. Ahir H., Bloom N., Furceri D. The World Uncertainty Index. NBER Working Paper. 2022. No. 29763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w29763.
8. Baker S. R., Bloom N., Davis S. J. Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2016. Vol 131. Issue 4. P. 1593-1636.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024.
9. Barbaglia L., Consoli S., Manzan S. Forecasting with Economic News. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. 2023. Vol. 41. Issue 3. P. 708-719.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2022.2060988.
10. European Central Bank. URL: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/.
11. European Commision. URL: https://commission.europa.eu/.
12. Glebocki H., Saha S. Global Uncertainty and Exchange Rate Conditions: Assessing the Impact of Uncertainty Shocks in Emerging Markets and Advanced
Economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 2024. Vol. 96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2024.102060.
13. International Monetary Fund. URL: https://www.imf.org/.
14. Lukauskas M., Pilinkienė V., Bruneckienė J., Stundžienė A., Grybauskas A., Ruzgas T. Economic Activity Forecasting Based on the Sentiment Analysis of News. Mathematics. 2022. Vol. 10. Issue 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10193461.
15. Mumtaz H., Ruch F. U. Policy Uncertainty and Aggregate Fluctuations: Evidence from Emerging and Developed Economies. The World Bank Economic Review. 2026. Vol. 40. Issue 3. P. 54-564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhaf023.
16. Popp A., Zhang F. A Note on International Spillovers of Economic Policy Uncertainty across Business Cycles: Evidence from OECD Countries. Macroeconomic Dynamics. 2024. Vol. 28. Issue 1. P. 99-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1365100522000748.
17. Qiu Y., Deschamps B., Liu X. Uncertainty and Macroeconomic Forecasts: Evidence from Survey Data. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.
2024. Vol. 224. P. 463-480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.06.008
_.png)