MARKETING-LOGISTIC PROVISION OF COUNTERACTION AGAINST DESTABILIZATIONAL EFFECTS IN THE PRODUCTION-TRADING CHAINS OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES

PDF (Українська)

Keywords

destabilization effects
marketing-logistics provision
production-trading chains
industrial enterprises

How to Cite

Semenov, K. L. (2018). MARKETING-LOGISTIC PROVISION OF COUNTERACTION AGAINST DESTABILIZATIONAL EFFECTS IN THE PRODUCTION-TRADING CHAINS OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES. Entrepreneurship and Trade, (23), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.36477/2522-1256-2018-23-20

Abstract

The article proves the existence of influence on industrial and commercial chains of industrial enterprises of destabilization effects by their accommodation from supply chains. It has been established that in the production and trading chains, they are the result of overlapping of many phenomena, such as Forrester, Burbidge, Hollishan and promotion effects. It was investigated that the latter in their relationship are the causes of the appearance of bullwhip-effect in the production and retail chains of enterprises. The necessity of the methods was substantiated and were proposed the directions of limiting the influence of destabilization effects in the production and trading chains of enterprises through the implementation of the system of actions of increasing the marketing and logistics provision in the direction of elimination of distortion of information and the delay of its receipt, which outlines the prospects for further research.

https://doi.org/10.36477/2522-1256-2018-23-20
PDF (Українська)

References

Форрестер Дж. Основы кибернетики пред- приятия. Индустриальная динамика / Дж. Форрес- тер; [пер. с англ.]. – М. : Прогресс, 1971. – 340 с.

Sterman J. D. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperseptions of feedback in dynamic decision making experiment // Management Science. – 1989. – Vol. 35. – № 3. – Pp. 321-339.

Lee L. Hau, Padmanabhan V., Whang S. Comments on – Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect // Management Science. 2004. – Vol. 50. – № 12. – Pp. 1887-1893.

Халлиган Б. Маркетинг в Интернете: как привлечь клиентов с помощью Google, социальных сетей и блогов / Б. Халлиган, Дж. Шах; [пер. с англ. Н. Коневская]. – М. : Диалектика, 2010. – 256 с.

Васелевський М. Ефект “бичачого батога” в ланцюзі поставок / М. Васелевський // Вісник Нац. ун-ту “Львівська політехніка” “Логістика”. – Львів:

Вид-во Нац. ун-ту “Львівська політехніка”, 2003. – № 472. – С. 12-21.

Смирнов І. Г. Логістика італійською: ефект “Бичачого Батога” та його подолання компанією “Barilla” / І. Г. Смирнов // Географія та туризм. – 2010. – Вип. 6. – С. 3-30.

Taylor D. H. Measurement and Analysis of Demand Amplification Accross the Supply Chain. 7. Closs D.J. i in., An Empirical Comparison of Anticipatory and Response-Based Supply Chain Strategies // The International Journal of Logistics Management. – 1998. – Vol. 9. – № 2. – Pp. 21-33.

Shukla V., Naim M. M., Yaseen E. A. 'Bullwhip' and 'backlash' in supply pipelines // International Journal of Production Research, Dec2009, Vol. 47 Issue 23, pp. 6477-6497.

Ярыгин О. Н. Математическая модель цепи поставок для исследования bullwhip-эффекта / О. Н. Ярыгин // Вектор науки ТГУ. – 2011. - №1(15).

Сергеев В. И. Управление цепями поставок : учебник для бакалавров и магистров / В. И. Сер-геев. – М. : Юрайт, 2014. – 479 с.

Сенге П. Пятая дисциплина. Искусство и практика самообучающихся организаций / П. Сенге. – М. : Олимп бизнес, 2003. – 408 с.

Forrester Dzh. (1971), Osnovy kybernetyky predpryiatyia. Yndustryalnaia dynamyka, Prohress, M., 340 s.

Sterman, J. D. (1989), Modeling managerial behavior: Misperseptions of feedback in dynamic decision making experiment, Management Science, vol. 35, # 3, pp. 321-339.

Lee L. Hau, Padmanabhan V. and Whang S. (2004), Comments on – Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect, Management Science, vol. 50 # 12, pp. 1887-1893.

Khallyhan B. and Shakh Dzh. (2010), Marketynh v Ynternete: kak pryvlech klyentov s pomoshchiu Google, sotsyalnykh setei y blohov, Dyalektyka, M., 256 s.

Vaselevskyi M. (2003), Efekt “bychachoho batoha” v lantsiuzi postavok, Visnyk Nats. un-tu “Lvivska politekhnika” “Lohistyka”, Vyd-vo Nats. un-tu “Lvivska politekhnika”, Lviv, # 472, s. 12-21.

Smyrnov, I. H. (2010), Lohistyka italiiskoiu: efekt “Bychachoho Batoha” ta yoho podolannia kompaniieiu “Barilla”, Heohrafiia ta turyzm, vyp. 6, s. 3-30.

Taylor, D. H. Measurement and Analysis of Demand Amplification Accross the Supply Chain. 7. Closs D. J. i in., An Empirical Comparison of Anticipatory and Response-Based Supply Chain Stra-tegies, The International Journal of Logistics Manage-ment, 1998, vol. 9, # 2, pp. 21-33.

Shukla V., Naim M. M. and Yaseen E. A. (2009), Bullwhip and backlash in supply pipelines, International Journal of Production Research, Dec, Vol. 47 Issue 23, pp. 6477-6497

Yaryhyn, O. N. (2011), Matematycheskaia model tsepy postavok dlia yssledovanyia bullwhip-эffekta, Vektor nauky THU, #1(15).

Serheev, V. Y. (2014), Upravlenye tsepiamy postavok : uchebnyk dlia bakalavrov y mahystrov, Yurait, M., 479 s.

Senhe P. (2003), Piataia dystsyplyna. Yskusstvo y praktyka samoobuchaiushchykhsia orha-nyzatsyi, Olymp byznes, M., 408 s.