SCIENTIFIC APPROACHES TO THE SYSTEMATIZATION OF ACCUMULATIVE PENSION MECHANISMS

Abstract

Abstract. The article attempts to systematize accumulative pension mechanisms (hereinafter - APM) with the aim of increasing their efficiency and sustainability under the conditions of modern socio-economic challenges. The detailed classification of APM according to various criteria makes it possible to identify the key characteristics and specifics of the functioning of these elements, which is necessary for the development of effective pension assets management strategies. Systems with a defined deposit and defined payments, as well as hybrid systems with a defined goal, are considered. Various approaches to forced and voluntary involvement of participants, as well as the specifics of funded and unfunded pension systems, are analyzed. Particular attention is paid to the classification of APM by the form of ownership and management, including state, private and hybrid systems, which allows taking into account various socio-economic factors and individual needs of participants. The issues of guaranteed, unguaranteed and partially guaranteed systems are highlighted, which have a significant impact on the level of financial security of beneficiaries and the degree of risk they are exposed to. The typology of APM according to the type of participants and the nature of their participation, covering individual, collective, universal, branch and corporate systems, is considered. Analysis of integrated and isolated systems from the point of view of their interaction with other social programs provides valuable recommendations for optimizing the overall effectiveness and sustainability of social protection. Comparison of investment, insurance, deposit and hybrid models made it possible to identify their features and approaches to assets management and payment provision. Taking into account the various characteristics of accumulative pension mechanisms, the main priority of the state should be the identification of optimal strategic guidelines in the process of implementing the accumulative element. A comprehensive analysis of needs and opportunities in accordance with the proposed classification should ensure the determination of the correct goals of the pension reform, which will contribute to minimizing negative consequences and ensuring the long-term stability and efficiency of the domestic pension system.

References

1. Зубик С. П. Накопичувальне пенсійне забезпечення як фактор розвитку економіки. Економіка України. 2018. № 1112 (684-685). С. 79-80. URL: http://economyukr.org.ua/docs/EU_18_11_071_uk.pdf.
2. Зубик С. П. Корпоративне пенсійне забезпечення та перспективи його розвитку в Україні. Український соціум. 2018. № 2. С. 153-155. URL: https://ukr-socium.org.ua/uk/archive/no-2-65-2018/korporativne-pensijne-zabezpechennja-taperspektivi-jogo-rozvitku-v-ukraini/.
3. Козак Т. М. Реформування системи пенсійного забезпечення в умовах демографічної кризи в Україні. Кваліфікаційна наукова праця на правах
рукопису. Національна академія державного управління при Президентові України. Київ, 2021. С. 44- 45. URL: https://fpk.in.ua/images/biblioteka/
4bac_finan/Kozak-T.M.-Reformuvannya-systemypensiynoho.pdf.
4. Рудик В. К., Чернишевська І. І. Особливості формування системи захисту пенсійних активів накопичувальних пенсійних програм. Облік і фінанси. 2022. № 1. С. 59-64.
5. Bovenberg Lans, Broeders Dirk & Mehlkopf Roel. The Promise of Defined Ambition Plans: Lessons for the United. Oxford University Press. Pension
Research Council WP. 2014-15. Р. 19-21. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2523554.
6. Blake David. Pension Schemes and Pension Funds in the United Kingdom. Oxford University Press. 2003. Р. 37. URL: https://global.oup.com/ academic/
product/pension-schemes-and-pension-funds-inthe-united-kingdom-9780199243532?cc=ua&lang=en&.
7. Campbell John Y. & Viceira Luis M. Strategic Asset Allocation: Portfolio Choice for Long-Term Investors. Oxford University Press. 2002. Р. 42-43. URL: https://academic.oup.com/ book/6093/chapter-abstract/149630678?redirectedFrom=fulltext.
8. Coelho Miguel. Old-Age Pension Systems: Characterization and Comparability. The Future of Pension Plans in the EU Internal Market. 2019. Р. 32.
URL: https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/fimchp/978-3-030-29497-7_2.html.
9. Holzmann Robert. Old-Age Pension Systems: Characterization and Comparability. World Bank eLibrary. 2016. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/fimchp/978-3-030-29497-7_2.html.
10. Holzmann Robert. World Bank Pension Systems. World Bank eLibrary. 2012. Р. 18-22. URL: https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/978-0-
8213-8848-8.
11. Rudolph Heinz P. Building Voluntary Pension Schemes in Emerging Economies. World Bank eLibrary. 2016. Р. 66. URL: https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-7779.
12. Rudolph Heinz P. Pension Funds with Automatic Enrollment Schemes: Lessons for Emerging Economies. World Bank eLibrary. 2019. Р. 26-27. URL: https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-8726.
13. Shiller Robert J. The New Financial Order: Risk in the 21st Century. Harvard University Press. 2003. Р. 30.
14. Terner, J. Mandatory Defined-Contribution Pension Systems: Progress — or Regression? International Social Security Review. 2022. Р. 22.
URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-246X.00103.
15. Weitzman Martin L. The Share Economy. Harvard University Press. 1986. Р. 60.
16. Whiteside Noel. Adapting Private Pensions to Public Purposes: Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Reform. Academia. 2006. Р. 20. URL: https://www.academia.edu/67590624/Adapting_private_pensions_to_public_purposes_historical_perspectives_on_the_politics_of_reform.
Published
2024-08-26