DISCIPLINARY RESPONSIBILITY OF AN EMPLOYEE OF THE NATIONAL POLICE OF UKRAINE
Abstract
Disciplinary liability of police officers is developing dynamically, but rather unsystematically, which does not allow to properly use the potential of this type of legal liability as an important means of maintaining official discipline in government, creating administrative and legal means to prevent and stop offenses of both employees and employers. rights and legitimate interests of employees of the National Police, etc. Analysis of the current legislation of Ukraine allows us to conclude that the existing model of disciplinary liability of police officers is strongly influenced by labor law with its inherent dispositiveness, which contradicts the administrative-legal concept of disciplinary legislation, which provides for the widespread use of mandatory regulation of civil service relations. This, in our opinion, causes an extremely low effect of the application of disciplinary liability to police measures and does not allow to ensure the proper level of discipline in the state apparatus. Unlike other types of legal liability, where the sanction for the committed offense is inevitable, the decision on the inevitability of punishment for committing a disciplinary offense is in the office of an official endowed with disciplinary and jurisdictional powers. At the same time, as the data of law enforcement practice show, the “right-obligation” given to him to apply a disciplinary sanction often remains unrealized. This article aims to consider and analyze the concept, content and essence of disciplinary liability of police officers, as well as to determine its functions, through which the lawful nature of the punishment for misconduct by an employee. The conclusions of this article will allow to understand to the greatest extent the conceptual apparatus of disciplinary responsibility of such a specific subject of labor relations as employees of the National Police of Ukraine.
References
2. Кодекс законів про працю України. Затверджується Законом № 322-VIII від 10.12.71 р. ВВР. 1971. Додаток до № 50. Ст. 375.
3. Барабаш А.Т. Регулирование обязанностей дисциплины труда робочих и служащих. Вопр. гос-ва и права. Харьков : Юрид. ин-т, 1974. Вып. 2. С. 132–142.
4. Венедиктов В.С. Юридична відповідальність у трудових правовідносинах: теорія і практика. Київ : НМК ВО, 1993. 84 с.
5. Липинский Д.А., Хачатуров Р.Л. Общая теория юридической ответственности. Москва, 2010.
6. Витрук Н.В. Общая теория юридической ответственности. Москва, 2009.
7. Закон України «Про Дисциплінарний статут Національної поліції України». Відомості Верховної Ради (ВВР). 2018. № 29. Ст. 233.
8. Сыроватская Л. А. Трудовое право : ученик. Высш. шк., 1995. 255 с.
9. Ортинський В.Л, Кісіль З.Р., Ковалів М.В. Управління в органах виконавчої влади України : навч. посіб. Київ : ЦУЛ, 2008. 296 с.
10. Скобелкин В.Н. Дисциплинарная ответственность рабочих и служащих. Воронеж : Центр.-Чернозем. кн. изд-во, 1985. 94 c.